From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: two sets of default header arguments for one language
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:25:21 +0200
Message-ID: <87r3m6q85a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2vbbi4bya.fsf@charm-ecran.irisa.fr>
	<5043E6AE-A82F-4F2A-8486-7826BA466703@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50446)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Za9Jq-0006YR-0U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:23:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Za9Jp-0003lX-D1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:23:46 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:44547)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Za9Jp-0003lJ-5g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:23:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5043E6AE-A82F-4F2A-8486-7826BA466703@gmail.com> (Rainer M.
	Krug's message of "Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:16:26 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:

> Do macros work for properties ? If yes, you could degine two macro,
> one for each set of properties.

No, they don't.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou