From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Errors get suppressed by org-babel-execute-src-block Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:33:38 -0500 Message-ID: <87r3g7ld59.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87pow4pb5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87bn7nrx7v.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87ziv5kf80.fsf@gmail.com> <87oablrery.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87mvr3b7ih.fsf@gmail.com> <87fuwnedrw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX7fS-00011X-0X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:33:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX7fO-0004BF-PX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:33:49 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX7fO-00049t-JB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:33:46 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aX7fM-0003SM-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:33:44 +0100 Received: from pool-74-104-158-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([74.104.158.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:33:44 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-74-104-158-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:33:44 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Aaron Ecay writes: > >> I’ve tested, and remote execution seems to work (when tramp works for >> me, which it does not do consistently – a known problem) > > Thank you. > > IMO, it looks good. You might as well push it and wait for more > feedback, if needed. > > Regards, I did some testing as well and it seems to work. -- Nick