From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: org-html-footnotes-section is not documented [9.0.3 (9.0.3-elpa @ /home/user1/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20161224/)] Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:00:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87r34251h1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87r347z5mr.fsf@user1-computer.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTBaP-0005mo-Gi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:00:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTBaO-0001HA-Nb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:00:53 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:43532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTBaO-0001Gz-HN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:00:52 -0500 Received: from saiph.selenimh (00004301000000000000074b.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::74b]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 549CE172094 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:00:47 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87r347z5mr.fsf@user1-computer.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (user1@user1-computer.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:11:24 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: user1 Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, user1 writes: > [BUG] "org-html-footnotes-section" is not documented anywhere except in > the source of ox-html.el (and autocomplete-guessable only after loading > ox-html.el), while the unrelated confusing "org-footnote-section" is > documented in the org-mode manual It is not really possible not desirable to document all variables in Org. So, I don't consider it as a bug. All defcustoms can be easily discovered using M-x customize-group RET org RET What do you find confusing about `org-footnote-section'? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou