From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Why is Org PDF LaTeX Output not readonly? Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:24:55 -0500 Message-ID: <87r32xymoo.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87o9y3pm8m.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <878tp7o1fd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <075f23b0867d4f43bac143679183abb1@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87vasagkaw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceiXB-0002sj-Oi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:25:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceiX7-0004AC-N0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:25:13 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=60852 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceiX7-00049J-Gp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:25:09 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceiWw-00053e-UV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:24:58 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Thursday, 16 Feb 2017 at 14:48, Nick Dokos wrote: > > [...] > >> I don't understand this: why is it easier if the buffer is read-only? >> Don't you still have to do M-x kill-buffer? > > IIUC, it's not so much read-only as a special mode where a single 'q' > will bury the buffer (or delete it, maybe). Sort of like docview or > what read-only views give. Ok - thanks! -- Nick