From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [Radio tables???] Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87r2nm1yav.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87shbrm7f5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871sfon5wj.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87fu446p9p.fsf@gmx.us> <871sfn2454.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87a7ua68f2.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f61vK-00054p-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f61vG-0002ZL-AO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:34 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58904 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f61vG-0002Yc-3g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:39:30 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f61t7-0003sR-QW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:37:17 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Hi Uwe, >>> >>> Uwe Brauer writes: >>> >>>> Templates are another example of this philosophy. I still can't use the >>>> actual git master version of orgmode since the old templates have been >>>> removed and the new syntax is not really explained. >>> >>> Please let me know what you are missing in terms of documentation. >>> >>> For all of the annoyance of losing the old template system, the data >>> structure of the new system is surely simpler. >>> >>> Also let me know about any remaining features that you are missing. >>> >> >> [apologies if this has been answered in the extensive earlier threads] >> >> IIUC, multi-letter abbrevs are not allowed. Is that because of tempo? >> If it can be done, could we at least have two-letter abbrevs? I did >> not use anything longer, but two-letter abbrevs were mnemonically >> useful. > > There should not be such a limitation anymore, though. > > Strings were not supported initially as the keyboard interface to select > blocks (C-c C-,) could not read more than one character. That limitation > has been removed. > Thanks! -- Nick