From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: priorities on lists Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 01:34:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2n1r17y.fsf@bzg.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBqPW-000831-M8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBqPU-0001Mg-W3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:46 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Samuel, Samuel Wales writes: > i am generally sort of leery of org adding header features to lists, > as lists are supposed to be lightweight, but currently, conversion > from header does preserve priority cookies, which i think is trttd. For the record and FWIW, I'm not for adding rich features to lists as it would make them too close to headlines IMO. Yes, I'm even against being able to cycling through list items. Best, -- Bastien