From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Jerram Subject: Re: *markup*, /markup/ and _markup_ true semantics [Was: Re: Ox-html: Replace with and with ] Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 21:46:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87r2g9agn4.fsf@ossau.homelinux.net> References: <87r2gfyj62.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87in1rkqlk.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7n1i8lr.fsf_-_@portable.galex-713.eu> <87ftwslb19.fsf@gmail.com> <875zxn362y.fsf@portable.galex-713.eu> <87h8h5ixb7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGstS-0006zH-H2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:46:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGstP-0008RK-7Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:46:46 -0400 Received: from ossau.homelinux.net ([18.217.239.99]:55438 helo=ip-172-31-40-63.us-east-2.compute.internal) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gGstP-0008QD-2v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 17:46:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h8h5ixb7.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Tim Cross , "Garreau, Alexandre" Cc: emacs-org list , Kaushal Modi Tim Cross writes: > On reading your response, we are probably not as far apart as I first > thought. However, we have now wondered into discussion which probably > isn't appropriate for this list. It is now in the realms of something > that would probably be better discussed with a good bottle of red or a > nice cold beer! > > There is lots that is 'broken' with the web and I suspect much of it we > will just have to live with and hope whatever the next evolution brings > us learns from our mistakes. > > Tim > > Garreau, Alexandre writes: > >> On 2018/10/27 at 07:15, Tim Cross wrote: >>> I have either misunderstood most of your position or I simply disagree >>> with it - I'm not sure which. >> >> maybe a mix of both? I hope it=E2=80=99s a misunderstandnment but if it= =E2=80=99s not I >> want to understand too so to get to a constructive agreement. [...] Well for what it's worth I have enjoyed reading all this; especially Alexandre's exposition of the difference between italic and bold when being read 'from near' and 'from far'. Thanks both. Neil