From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Possible to exclude/include tags for agenda custom commands? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87r1ypyb61.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736bfxwu0.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o8u0zuxn.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87imk4yriw.fsf@gnu.org> <87k14hzza8.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4gBN-00072W-BO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:23:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k14hzza8.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:57:19 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Adam, Adam Porter writes: > Yes, I'd be glad for it to be listed on Worg. Feel free to add it if > you like, or I might add it myself after I add a bit more content. I'll let you add a link to your page on Worg when you have the time. > I was thinking about working on Worg rather than making yet another > resource, but: > > 1. I saw you mention that you're planning to reorganize Worg's content > soon, and I wouldn't want to interfere with that. Just to tell you a bit more about my plan: I will take the time to work on Worg next week, creating a dedicated branch and publishing it on orgmode.org/worg-next/ or something. > 2. I sometimes feel hesitant to put a lot of effort into curating and > organizing content on Worg because, like all wikis, that work can easily > be invalidated if others come along later and add content in random > places. Yes, I understand. Worg was a place to gather contributions when the Org users formed a small dedicated group. Org's "community" is larger now, and I think Org should be a place with less textual contents and more links to useful stuff. Like a giant structured FAQ, more than a giant... mess. > One of my goals for this "org-almanac" is to catalog content in a > somewhat canonical way, to avoid the "wiki effect." For this project, > I'd rather have less content that's organized more clearly, than have > lots of content scattered about. Of course, I don't presume to say that > the way I've done it is the best way, and I'm experimenting as I go. > > Anyway, do you have any more thoughts about these issues? I think that your goals for org-almanac resemble the ones I have for Worg: less content, clear structure, make it more maintainable, even collectively. Without sacrificing the current richness, of course. This will be more tangible when I start pushing worg-next/. Thanks, -- Bastien