From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Numeric Priorities Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:28:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ps08qjko.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> <7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl> <87ps0rx65n.fsf_-_@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> <87odfsfmk2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <873ax4s4za.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnz2-0003mR-8e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:28:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnyy-0003lV-GF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:28:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZnyy-0003lQ-CV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:28:16 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZnyx-0003Pf-OK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:28:15 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1216612nfh for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:28:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitri Minaev's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:17:11 +0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Dmitri Minaev" writes: > Ah, but the notion of the default priority has no special meaning > besides what jumps up after the first S-up, so we can easily assume > that the "default" priority is A :). Indeed. > Or set the priorities line to #+PRIORITIES: A C C But then S-down on a headline with no priority yields this message: "No priority cookie found in line" -- which might actually be okay. Again, maybe this is just *my* own bias that make me feel the cycling should not stop... and again, we shouldn't fuss to much on this issue! -- Bastien