From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Max Mikhanosha Subject: Re: Re: PATCH: include in-progress/started todos into daily agenda Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:00:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87ps04droy.wl%max@openchat.com> References: <87sl51dud4.wl%max@openchat.com> <87r6kkdvq3.wl%max@openchat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iavmk-0006p2-Be for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:00:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iavmh-0006lp-Dd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:00:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iavmh-0006lE-1Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:00:15 -0400 Received: from p84-72.acedsl.com ([66.114.84.72] helo=momoland.openchat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iavmg-0002TJ-9Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:00:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:18:12 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > What I don't understand is this: > > If you have an item scheduled, and if you don't mark it DONE, it > will be in the list of scheduled items on every future date until > you finally mark it done. It seems to me that this does > *automatically* already exactly what you are aiming for. > > What am I missing? Doh, now that you pointed that out I'm trying to retrace my steps as to why I do not just leave the items scheduled. I'm using org mode for around 7 months and initially I was scheduling a lot of my items, but then scheduled less and less, and only the items that are short and definitely can be done with in a day. Same reason I guess as described by John Wiegley in his blog post, seeing 5 entries like "14x Finish coding feature X" in the daily agenda is discouraging and makes one feel like falling behind all the time. Seeing "INPROGRESS Finish coding feature X" instead does not discourage me as I don't have to be reminded that I had already wasted 2 weeks on it, it just reminds me to continue to work on it today. Regards, Max > > On Sep 27, 2007, at 16:33, Max Mikhanosha wrote: > > > Responding to my own email, because I accidentally deleted Carsten > > response. > > > > Carsten suggested that I check the block agenda functionality to see > > if it already does the same thing. The block agenda have the following > > little quirks which made me implement my own solution instead: > > > > Example of block agenda: > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Day-agenda: > > Thursday 27 September 2007 > > proj: Scheduled: TODO [#C] Some scheduled task > > > > ==================== > > Global list of TODO items of type: INPROGRESS > > proj: INPROGRESS [#A] Some task that is already in progress > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > 1. Items from the block agenda are a separate block, and not sorted > > together with the items scheduled for the same day. So even if my > > in-progress item is A its shown below the scheduled for this day > > item that is C > > > > 2. There are 3 lines of vertical space taken by the empty line at the > > end of the daily agenda, the === separator and the "Global list" > > heading. I usually use emacs from tty, so my screen is 100x30 so 3 > > lines is 1/3 of the whole agenda buffer. > > > > Below is how it looks like when in-progress items are treated as if > > they were scheduled for today, which is what my patch does. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Day-agenda: > > Thursday 27 September 2007 > > proj: INPROGRESS [#A] Some task that is already in progress > > proj: Scheduled: TODO [#C] Some scheduled task > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Which is much clearer to me. The in-progress tasks are in the same > > list as the tasks scheduled for today, and are sorted together. > > > > Its not problem if my patch is rejected, I have a less invasive > > solution for my own needs that does the same thing with a single > > defadvice. I have only sent a patch because IMHO ppl were already > > discussing the same method of mixing the daily agenda with in-progress > > items, but with a "manual" method of managing the in-progress items, > > ie re-scheduling them every day until done with them. > > > > At Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:50:15 -0400, Max Mikhanosha wrote: > >> > >> I had always used the day/weekly/mothly agenda vs the searchable > >> agenda separately and sometimes missed things because they were in one > >> list but not another. For example when looking into a tags based > >> agenda for :computer, I may have missed some other item that was > >> scheduled for today but not tagged with computer, and via versa. > >> > >> The method described in the post titled "Not using GTD" post, where > >> only the daily agenda is the primary agenda used solves this problem, > >> but I don't like to schedule/reschedule my items all the time. > >> > >> So inspired by the "Not using GTD" post, proposed patch allows > >> specifying a TODO type that would always be included into daily > >> agenda on a current day, as if it was scheduled. > >> > >> So one can just mark items that need to be worked on doing the day as > >> lets say "INPROGRESS" and they would stay in the daily agenda > >> alongside/intermixed with the items scheduled for today until you > >> close them. If you like to postpone the item, you put it as TODO > >> again, and it would disappear. > >> > >> Proposed patch is as plain text below, feel free to rewrite/change > >> as the method I've used may not have been optimal. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Max > >> > >> diff -rp -x '*.orig' -x '*.elc' -x '*~' org-5.10a.orig/org.el > >> org-5.10a/org.el > >> *** org-5.10a.orig/org.el Wed Sep 26 13:33:20 2007 > >> --- org-5.10a/org.el Wed Sep 26 16:33:52 2007 > >> *************** When nil, only the days which actually h > >> *** 2323,2328 **** > >> --- 2323,2342 ---- > >> :group 'org-agenda-daily/weekly > >> :type 'boolean) > >> > >> + (defcustom org-agenda-show-inprogress-todos nil > >> + "Non-nil means, include the TODO's of the type specified by > >> + `org-inprogress-todos' into the daily agenda." > >> + :group 'org-agenda-daily/weekly > >> + :type 'boolean) > >> + > >> + (defcustom org-inprogress-todos "INPROGRESS" > >> + "Specifies TODO type that would be automatically included into > >> + the daily agenda when `org-agenda-show-inprogress-todos' is set. > >> + You can specify more then one value separating them with |, for > >> + example INPROGRESS|STARTED" > >> + :group 'org-agenda-daily/weekly > >> + :type 'string) > >> + > >> (defcustom org-agenda-format-date 'org-agenda-format-date-aligned > >> "Format string for displaying dates in the agenda. > >> Used by the daily/weekly agenda and by the timeline. This should be > >> *************** NDAYS defaults to `org-agenda-ndays'." > >> *** 18056,18062 **** > >> (- sd (+ (if (< d 0) 7 0) d))))) > >> (day-numbers (list start)) > >> (inhibit-redisplay (not debug-on-error)) > >> ! s e rtn rtnall file date d start-pos end-pos todayp nd) > >> (setq org-agenda-redo-command > >> (list 'org-agenda-list (list 'quote include-all) start-day > >> ndays)) > >> ;; Make the list of days > >> --- 18070,18077 ---- > >> (- sd (+ (if (< d 0) 7 0) d))))) > >> (day-numbers (list start)) > >> (inhibit-redisplay (not debug-on-error)) > >> ! s e rtn rtnall file date d start-pos end-pos todayp nd > >> ! args) > >> (setq org-agenda-redo-command > >> (list 'org-agenda-list (list 'quote include-all) start-day > >> ndays)) > >> ;; Make the list of days > >> *************** NDAYS defaults to `org-agenda-ndays'." > >> *** 18102,18117 **** > >> (setq end-pos (point)))) > >> (setq files thefiles > >> rtnall nil) > >> (while (setq file (pop files)) > >> (catch 'nextfile > >> (org-check-agenda-file file) > >> ! (if org-agenda-show-log > >> ! (setq rtn (org-agenda-get-day-entries > >> ! file date > >> ! :deadline :scheduled :timestamp :sexp :closed)) > >> ! (setq rtn (org-agenda-get-day-entries > >> ! file date > >> ! :deadline :scheduled :sexp :timestamp))) > >> (setq rtnall (append rtnall rtn)))) > >> (if org-agenda-include-diary > >> (progn > >> --- 18117,18132 ---- > >> (setq end-pos (point)))) > >> (setq files thefiles > >> rtnall nil) > >> + (setq args '(:deadline :scheduled :timestamp :sexp)) > >> + (when org-agenda-show-log > >> + (push :closed args)) > >> + (when org-agenda-show-inprogress-todos > >> + (push :inprogress args)) > >> (while (setq file (pop files)) > >> (catch 'nextfile > >> (org-check-agenda-file file) > >> ! (setq rtn (apply 'org-agenda-get-day-entries > >> ! file date args)) > >> (setq rtnall (append rtnall rtn)))) > >> (if org-agenda-include-diary > >> (progn > >> *************** the documentation of `org-diary'." > >> *** 18606,18611 **** > >> --- 18621,18632 ---- > >> ;; The way we repeatedly append to `results' makes it O(n^2) > >> :-( > >> (while (setq arg (pop args)) > >> (cond > >> + ((and (eq arg :inprogress) > >> + (equal date (calendar-current-date))) > >> + (let ((org-select-this-todo-keyword > >> + org-inprogress-todos)) > >> + (setq rtn (org-agenda-get-todos)) > >> + (setq results (append results rtn)))) > >> ((and (eq arg :todo) > >> (equal date (calendar-current-date))) > >> (setq rtn (org-agenda-get-todos)) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > > > > > -- > Carsten Dominik > Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" > Universiteit van Amsterdam > Kruislaan 403 > NL-1098SJ Amsterdam > phone: +31 20 525 7477 >