From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: apparent bug in org-insert-link with active region Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:44:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87przvjh0x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <41c818190710030856i1b0280bdvc88a82e954f738b8@mail.gmail.com> <87abqzsxw4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <41c818190710031716y7cd93488o10a6faa05579e58a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdOC8-0003oj-09 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:44:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdOC6-0003kP-2d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:44:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdOC5-0003kB-Si for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:44:37 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdOC5-0006v6-Gx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:44:37 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m4so335472uge for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:44:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41c818190710031716y7cd93488o10a6faa05579e58a@mail.gmail.com> (William Henney's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:16:38 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "William Henney" writes: > 5a. If the link I entered in step 3 was something like > "http://foo.org", then all is well - the deleted region from step 1 > appears as the default description. > > 5b. However, if the link I inserted in step 3 was something like > "file:/etc/whatever", then I no longer get the deleted region as the > default description. Instead, I just get "file:/etc/whatever" > > I hope this is clearer. Yes, much clearer! Thanks for the detailed explanations. -- Bastien