From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: handling cyclic tasks (general question) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:34:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87pryp8wsg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87r6j7xjrt.fsf@makhector.hypnokush.org> <874pg2ck3u.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zlxtvghc.fsf@makhector.hypnokush.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ion7L-0008B8-5t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:34:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ion7J-0008Av-92 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:34:50 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ion7J-0008As-3c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:34:49 -0500 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.232]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ion7I-00021k-QS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:34:49 -0500 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so652110huc for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:34:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zlxtvghc.fsf@makhector.hypnokush.org> (Stuart McLean's message of "Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:38:23 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stuart McLean Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Stuart, Stuart McLean writes: > (or, more likely, I don't know exactly what I want ;-) ). Er, at least now you *know* that :) > ps Bastien, in your signature you say "Remember: use `Reply All' to > send replies to the list." This is appended to my signature by the mailing list bot (mailman). > I use Gnus 5.11. Is a Wide Reply, the same as Reply All? AFAIK, yes. "Reply All" is a most common labelling across mail user agents, but the result should be the same. I guess the warning in the sig is because a simple "Reply To" will only reply to the sender (as it should be, even if some mailing list don't respect this convention...) > Sorry for the naive question, I love using Gnus, but what you can do > with it is, well, a _lot_. A _lot_ is not enough to say! -- Bastien