From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Re: ECB and org-mode Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:52:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87pr8pi1yi.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87k4z0yeqz.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87y6ng6335.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87iqehhp2n.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87tyy1zwmh.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyKEJ-0001Ex-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:54:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyKEE-00018X-SO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:54:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57158 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyKEE-000182-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:54:26 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:56131) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyKEC-0004q6-Hr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:54:24 -0400 Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.43]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyKE4-0007Nm-I3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:54:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tyy1zwmh.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> From: Eric S Fraga List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:57:42 +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: > > (if (string= major-mode "org-mode") > > Here, you want (eq major-mode 'org-mode). Your version also works, but Makes sense! D'uh. Of course there is a way of comparing modes. This is *emacs*, after all! [...] > > Again, apologies for my minimal (yet increasing) elisp knowledge! > > Hey, it works! What do you want more? ;-) I've learned even more today! My knowledge of elisp may not be increasingly exponentially but it is at least monotonic in the right direction ;-). I could ask for nothing more. Thanks, eric