From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:43:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37424 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ptg07-0001wn-C2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:45:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptg02-0008II-CW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:45:27 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:55106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ptg02-0008Hz-6r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:45:22 -0500 Received: by mail-bw0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 17so3583647bwz.0 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 04:45:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> (Julien Danjou's message of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:30:39 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Julien, Julien Danjou writes: > How about splitting the mailing list in a user and a development list? I am in favor of using a [DEV] tag and stick to one single list. The path from users to developers (and to core Org developers) is a continuum, keeping this continuum on one list is a good thing. What other people think? -- Bastien