From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: case sensitivity in sorting
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 02:19:49 +0200
Message-ID: <87pqnvmkey.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=GrUTsOAaEdABqAid_coR_L+5png@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60682)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QIVFP-0001zw-Pi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:19:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QIVFP-00043M-17
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:19:51 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:59984)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QIVFO-00043E-Qx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:19:50 -0400
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so3472166wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 06 May 2011 17:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=GrUTsOAaEdABqAid_coR_L+5png@mail.gmail.com> (Samuel
	Wales's message of "Fri, 6 May 2011 14:32:13 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> C-c ^ seems to sort case-sensitively regardless of argument.
>
>   1) a
>   2) B

This should be fixed now. Thank you for reporting this.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou