From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] crash while ping-ponging between back-to-back footnotes.
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:41:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87pqlwbkmk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <81hb78n9i8.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxh06a5s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<81y60k4tj0.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58993)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Qbylu-0006K1-1t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Qbyls-0002u4-If
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:53 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:47341)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Qbyls-0002tn-7V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:41:52 -0400
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1272574wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <81y60k4tj0.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Wed, 29
	Jun 2011 19:41:15 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

>> Both fontification and export get confused if footnotes are not
>> separated with a space -- I think it's okay to live with this
>> one-space-between-footnotes policy, but I let Nicolas decides.
>
> Since [fn:2] is automagically added by C-c C-x f may be it can check for
> an immediately preceding footnote and DTRT (inserting space or whatever
> the preference is) if it is not done already.

I'm a bit confused. I still fail to see what is wrong about the current
behavior in master branch. AFAICT, two or more footnotes side-by-side
are correctly handled.

I think Bastien somehow tested an intermediary revision of the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou