From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Change example timestamps to not occur in headlines Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:52:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqay8vb4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ty0a92it.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMIjZ-0000GX-Iu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:51:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMIjU-0001Iv-2u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:51:13 -0400 Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:47011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMIjT-0001Ij-T8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:51:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Brian van den Broek's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:44:28 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Brian van den Broek Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Brian, Brian van den Broek writes: > I agree that the discouragement of timestamps in headlines should > remain in the docs. > > But I still do think the docs examples should be changed to comply > with that advice. I tried twice to send a patch, yet failed to do so > in a manner recognized by patchwork. One of your patches made it to patchword. > I *think* I know how now, but > elected not to send a third attempt. Should I send it once again? No, it has already been applied: http://orgmode.org/w/?p=org-mode.git;a=commit;h=8f3dc945 Thanks! -- Bastien