From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: makefile regression Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:20:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87pq9w192m.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWroI-00029i-VL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:19:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWroC-00020y-NI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:19:46 -0400 Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:61192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWroC-00020V-HW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:19:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Tue, 22 May 2012 10:43:52 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Greg Troxel Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Greg, Greg Troxel writes: > For a long time, I've been updating org from git every week or two via: > > update-org () { > (cd $HOME/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode && git pull && make) > } > > and I have emacs pointed at that directory. This is on NetBSD where > "make" is BSD make. > > Today, I updated again and got: > > make: "/home/gdt/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode/Makefile" line 6: Need an operator > make: "/home/gdt/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode/Makefile" line 87: Need an operator > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > make: stopped in /home/gdt/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode > > and it seems recent changes have required beyond-POSIX-make features. > > This seems unfortunate; I don't understand why building org has to be so > complicated. It does *not* have to be. > If it is complicated, it seems best to use > autoconf/automake, which already have worked out most of the portability > issues. > > At the very least a dependency on GNU make should be documented, if that > is indeed an intentional decision by the community. (I haven't seen > any discussion, but I confess to not quite keeping up with with > emacs-orgmode traffic.) I will let Achim reply to your issue here. I agree we should stick to something as simple and portable as possible. We will document all the changes in this area for the 7.9 release. Best, -- Bastien