From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Torsten Bronger Subject: Re: Bad indentation with visual-line-mode Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppzkudje.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <87621ertu9.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> <87a9qqeybo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3ptkb77.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> <8738whpg2o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAxcg-0003WP-Oj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:09:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAxcf-0004bJ-KN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:09:46 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAxcf-0004Zq-EM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:09:45 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAxcx-0001io-JO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:10:03 +0100 Received: from ip-176-199-173-166.unitymediagroup.de ([176.199.173.166]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:10:03 +0100 Received: from bronger by ip-176-199-173-166.unitymediagroup.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:10:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hallöchen! Bastien writes: > Torsten Bronger writes: > > [...] > >> And, shouldn't visual-line-mode's behaviour that it doesn't >> respect the indentation of org-mode be considerd a bug, too? > > I don't think so, I believe this is an inherent limitation of > visual-line-mode. > > The basic meaning of "indentation" is "indentation at the true > beginning of a line", not "indentation at the visual left margin", > so I doubt anyone can claim that the visual "indentation" you see > with `visual-line-mode' should be displayed like the real > indentation you have without out. Possibly. On the other hand, both "longlines" and "auto-fill" indent org-mode lists nicely. The longlines mode was removed from Emacs, and there should be a replacement for every usecase before you remove something I think. I believe visual-line-mode is the best candidate for such a replacement. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com