From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [babel] Commenting out src blocks for tangling Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:31:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppzinjj2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87r4k18wy2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mwup8t0q.fsf@breezy.my.home> <87bob58sdi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <512e97cf.82c1ec0a.76d4.ffffc5f1@mx.google.com> <512F1CDF.80906@gmail.com> <877glsg57i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <867gls9451.fsf@somewhere.org> <512F26A1.7020807@gmail.com> <86y5e87osz.fsf@somewhere.org> <512F4DEB.7050202@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBkLm-0002Gt-09 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBkLk-0006ms-9b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:48531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBkLk-0006mi-3N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:32 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ez12so373936wid.12 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 03:11:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512F4DEB.7050202@gmail.com> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:30:35 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer M Krug Cc: emacs-orgmode , Sebastien Vauban Hi Rainer, Rainer M Krug writes: > Follow up: would it be possible to have the same mechanism for tangling, i.e. a tag :notangle:? > functioning would be equivalent to property tangle: no but more visible and consistent with the > :noexport:? One could also define properties to be tangled and not tangled for different scenarios? One approach could be to use export filters here. I'd rather let (or someone else) find out if this approach is easy enough before considering adding a new keyword like :notangle:. But if you (or someone else) come up with a patch implementing the :notangle: approach, of course we might consider it too. Thanks, -- Bastien