From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Association list between major-mode-names and babel
 identifiers
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:26:52 -0600
Message-ID: <87pplq3vnm.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ob1apusq.fsf@gmail.com> <861ty689gn.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47825)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1WO8cJ-0008Iq-Ve
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:36:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1WO8cF-0008P1-8Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:36:23 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]:56253)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1WO8cF-0008Od-0k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:36:19 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so1290278pdi.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:

> Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>> |------------+------------------------+------------+-----------------+----------|
>> | shell      | a shell                | sh         |                 |          |
>> |------------+------------------------+------------+-----------------+----------|
>
> Regarding this one, I remember some posts saying `sh' was renamed into
> `shell', but I'm not sure anymore whether that was fully equivalent or
> only in some edge cases.
>

Currently a bash code block will be run with bash, and a shell code
block will be run with sh.  I believe both will use shell-script-mode.

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D