From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:54:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87ppie2c2h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87tx7qxahl.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvA91-00009X-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:54:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvA8v-0007oh-Eq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:54:39 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::234]:63911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvA8v-0007oM-BK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:54:33 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w8so2290115qac.11 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:54:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tx7qxahl.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte , Mark Edgington Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Eric, hi all, 2014ko ekainak 12an, Eric Schulte-ek idatzi zuen: >=20 > I just ran across this need myself, and updated an old solution to work > with the new exporter. See the thread and my solution at the following. >=20 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-06/msg00238.html It=E2=80=99s really wonderful that you and the other members of the org community have devoted lots of careful effort to this problem. See also: - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html#ignoreheadline - http://mid.gmane.org/87lhvvjoo0.fsf@gmx.us - http://mid.gmane.org/87zjii42k9.fsf@ucl.ac.uk Many of the solutions work approximately, but not in all circumstances =E2=80=93 see the discussion on worg. Searching my email archives for the string =E2=80=9Cignoreheading=E2=80=9D in 2014, I see threads from May 14, = May 9, May 6, March 27, March 17, and Jan 7 on this topic. It seems reasonable to ask whether this constitutes enough user interest to make this a core feature. The benefits would include: - the code can be made robust by the combined effort of those interested - the feature can be incorporated into the test suite, so it won=E2=80=99t accidentally break in the future - it will be more =E2=80=9Cdiscoverable=E2=80=9D in the org info manual (wh= ich almost certainly gets a larger audience than worg) What do you think? --=20 Aaron Ecay