From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: impossible to have footnote touching verbatim
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:01:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87pphz732k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87y4wngzon.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4wn75dr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87pphzgypo.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55086)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzBMW-0001JB-QF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:01:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzBMK-00035d-RQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:01:12 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:37866)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzBMK-00035V-Li
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:01:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87pphzgypo.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Mon, 23
	Jun 2014 16:25:39 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:

> Should this be done personally or in master?

I can't think of a case where it could lead to confusion, so I'd say it
can go in master, at least until someone complains, if ever.

BTW, as a reminder, I'm all for thinking again how emphasis/verbatim
markup is defined in Org but I doubt changing it by small touches will
do any good. IMO, it needs to be discussed as a whole.

I think a good markup should
  - not need to be customizable,
  - allow any number of (non-consecutive) newline characters,
  - allow escaping markup in verbatim objects.

For example, much like radio links, bold object could be defined as

  1. anything but an alphanumeric character (including nothing),
  2. / character,
  3. an alphanumeric character,
  4. anything excepted 2 or more consecutive newline characters
     (non-greedy),
  5. an alphanumeric character,
  6. / character,
  7. anything but an alphanumeric character (including nothing).

For simplicity, I ignore the special case /a/ for the moment.

The verbatim would be the same, with a slight change in 4th element:

  4. the same, with \= treated as =


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou