From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] org.el: make org-paragraph-fill ignore \[...\] regions starting and ending a line Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:40:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppg6bvzd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87mwbbp45b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGwOC-0002tQ-SY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:40:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGwO4-0001ta-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:40:20 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:45859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGwO3-0001sx-VX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:40:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Federico Beffa's message of "Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:27:12 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Federico Beffa Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Federico Beffa writes: > The example highlight the difference that I suggested to remove in the > very first place (by making \[...\] an environment). This was rejected > to preserve backward compatibility and that's fine. So I moved on to a > second proposal: modify the paragraph filling function. This example illustrates that it would be nice to fill two different structures, well, differently. > From your sentence in your last reply: > "... even though M-q cannot tell that difference (with your proposal, > the behaviour would be the same in both cases)." > I understand that there is no technical deficiency in it. I cannot speak about technical deficiency. I didn't look closely at the code. There are some gotchas, though, e.g., when auto-filling (moving from "inline" to "block"). > Am I therefore correct in saying that if you prefer not to include > this proposal in org-mode it isn't for technical reasons but it is > a matter of opinion/taste? I'm just pointing out an ergonomy (or consistency) annoyance in your proposal. I'm not thrilled by faking the filling mechanism. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou