From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [ANN] [OT] New Android app (Orgzly) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:10:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppa5ghrp.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <87lhkvm4nb.fsf@orgzly.com> <87fvb222ft.fsf@gnu.org> <2015-01-23T10-50-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoJX-00015a-NF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:11:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoJU-0002z0-FO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:10:59 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:54683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEoJU-0002yu-8N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:10:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92CF4AC58 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:10:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUSxK+DmdRXB for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:10:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F5234AC4F for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 01:10:55 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <2015-01-23T10-50-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2015-01-23, at 10:56, Karl Voit wrote: > I don't like proprietary software. I promote open solutions wherever > I can and accept a more painful living by ignoring comfy proprietary > solutions. +1, the same with me. Although I do use some non-free-as-defined-by-FSF software. (Apparently, to be fully FSF-compliant you shouldn't say "open". Assuming that you *want* to be FSF-compliant, that is;-). BTW: from now on I'm going to use the terms: "free-as-defined-by-FSF" and its negation, because I do not want to borrow terms from an entity whose philosophy I do oppose.) > However, I do like to see (maintained) alternatives of MobileOrg and > I do like to see third party tools using the Org syntax for storing > and managing information. +1 > So: Jose, I like what I see on your web page and please do carry on. ^^^^ Neven, not Jose! > Thanks you for making it clear that your software is not open source > and please keep on doing this. +1 again. > I will probably never use Orgzly by myself because I like open > solutions. I accept that other people might want to have an > easy-to-use closed alternative solution to use Org on their phone. > It's so much better than using Evernote or other cloud-based > solutions. I might want to use Orgzly. (I do use Evernote occasionally, btw; yes, it is terrible.) BTW, one more question: what about all the emails about dropbox-based syncing of Emacs config or Org files? Why didn't they get banned? All are equal, but some are more equal than others? > Thanks for promoting Org! +1! -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University