From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp9ixfws.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpzicjn.fsf@pank.eu> <87y4o6xi0h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4mdst5.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7Ic-0008Iq-N9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:40:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7IZ-0007tb-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:40:06 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:54771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL7IZ-0007qw-5K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:40:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mw4mdst5.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:22:46 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> If you write something like >> >> [cite: pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2] >> >> wouldn't it possible to guess you want to use multicite? IOW, does using >> "multicite" really implies a change in the syntax? > > To fully support multicite you need keyless citations in the beginning and > the end of the list, e.g. > > [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] > > Of course, for textcite it's easy to replicate wihtout. For parencites > and footcites, less so. I think [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] is regular and readable enough. So, there's no need to add special support for multicite. Regards,