From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:57:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp9agovh.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNIR2-0007tG-Tb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:57:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNIQz-0003uY-KC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:57:48 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNIQz-0003uS-EO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 04:57:45 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YNIQy-0001mF-C4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:57:44 +0100 Received: from tsn109-201-154-188.dyn.nltelcom.net ([109.201.154.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:57:44 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn109-201-154-188.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:57:44 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Matt Price writes: > I am generally much more positive than Thomas, being, for the most part, > ecstatic at the thought of a built-in citation syntax which will make > citations in org workable for bumbling nonprogrammers like myself. > > However, I agree that the distinction between parenthetical and footnotes > citations is unhelpful for me. Whenever I switch between Chicago and APA, > for instance, zotero converts my footnotes to parenthetical expressions. > To me this seems an essential feature. Maybe Richard stepped back on this, but I think at some point the consensus was that you'd have two main cite types, namely @· and [@·] which can be mapped to whatever, e.g. @· → textcite by default and [@·] → \parencite. Then the switch would be. #+INLINE-CITE: textcite #+SQUARE-CITE: parencite —Rasmus -- Governments should be afraid of their people