From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:14:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp8rb1i3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <877fv6xfaq.fsf@gmail.com> <87twya2ak0.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj81aa97.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioep2r6p.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4ngbgm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSWiV-0000C3-Pb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:13:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSWiL-0007ni-Tg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:13:24 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:50357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSWiL-0007nc-Nt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:13:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> (Richard Lawrence's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:50:49 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Lawrence writes: > What's the next step here? Adding support for multiple references? > multi-cites? `&'-keys? To support multi cites, we must first decide how the parsed will present information, i.e., what are the properties in the following case [cite:pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; post] There is also the following degenerate case [cite:pre; pre ;post] What should be done about it? I didn't implement &-keys as there is no consensus on them. Regards,