From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Scheme code block gives false error message Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:38:12 -0400 Message-ID: <87pp1kh37f.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <877fnuj2q4.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87y4gagkxc.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87twqxglwu.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87a8so6daw.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbfCb-0001UV-Q5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:38:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbfCW-0007VB-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:38:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbfCW-0007Um-Fo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:38:28 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbfCS-0005oF-J3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:38:24 +0200 Received: from pool-108-20-41-232.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.20.41.232]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:38:24 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-20-41-232.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:38:24 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Lawrence Bottorff writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >   > > > So it looks like Scheme is not a Babel language after all. > > What do you mean? There is an ob-scheme.el but it's buggy: I suspect > that every ob-*.el is buggy to some extent. Does that mean that every > language that babel supports is not a babel language? > > I only mean it can't be used as it now is. I was only three simple > example code snippets into this when it proved inoperable. I wanted to > use it as a study aid for HTDP or SICP or one of the other Scheme > tutorials . . . as in make some personal comments around code > samples.   > > > Is there a formal "bug report" to do? > > Well, whether a formal bug report will help is not clear: it's probably > best that one be submitted if only for documentation purposes, but > whether it will be addressed or not very much depends on somebody > picking it up and fixing it. You might be able to persuade "Möbius" > to sign FSF papers and submit his implementation (but note that there > are limitations there, as mentioned on the page you linked - so there > will be bugs...) > > I keep putting off learning elisp. Maybe this is the "Schub" I > need. You know, stop being such a needy org-mode tourist and start > being a local. :-) > That would be ideal :-) Did you try the alternative ob-scheme.el? If (when) you do, maybe you can post some comments: would it be worth to pursue replacing the current one with the alternative? -- Nick