From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe Brauer Subject: Re: Bug: org-toggle-latex-fragment fails, example included [8.3.1 (8.3.1-103-g366dc4-elpa @ /home/oub/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150907/)] Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:50:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp1k86ka.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87twqw2260.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zbl0p-0004F5-EO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:50:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zbl0m-00046n-7P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:50:47 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zbl0l-00046f-Ja for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:50:43 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zbl0j-0000iK-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:50:41 +0200 Received: from gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es ([147.96.12.99]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:50:41 +0200 Received: from oub by gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:50:41 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> "Charles" == Charles C Berry writes: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> For the following example, >> >> $$w∈ {C([0,T];H_{s,\delta} : \|w(0,\cdot )\|_{H_{s,\delta}} \leq M_0, w(t,x)\leq 0}$$ >> > $$w\in {C([0,T];H_{s,\delta} : \|w(0,\cdot )\|_{H_{s,\delta}} \leq M_0, w(t,x)\leq 0}$$ You are right, the evil ∈! Since I have started to use prettify-symbol mode it is difficult to distinguish two situations: - prettify-symbols, using overlays, *displays* \in by ∈ - but also \in can be *replaced* by the UTF8 ∈ After replacing the UTF8 by its latex constructions everything works fine. Sorry Uwe