From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: clock start time is gone Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:43:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87poehv1l3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIBx9-0004pL-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 06:43:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIBx6-0002YV-TE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 06:43:11 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:33372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIBx6-0002YL-MG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 06:43:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:18:08 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > recent maint. > > just wondering what i could be doing wrong. > > it is /usually/ the case that i get clock start tmie is gone when i > try to clock out. This is odd, as this shouldn't be usual. > it isn't gone. so i do org-clock-cancel, which is slow. this leaves > the start time. > > so i do org-clock-in, which presents me with all the options. i > choose K because i want to be clocked out. > > but it ignores the K and keeps me clocked in. > > so i clock out. btw, clocking out is slow. > org-clock-remove-empty-clock-drawer takes up 95% of the time. It is possible if you have really large clock drawers, i.e., hundreds of clocks in it. > and this leaves me with a correct clock line and a new clock line with > 0 time on it. > > so then i have to kill the new clock line. It would be nice to have an ECM for this report, with emphasis on the "M". Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou