From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Respect buffer-local value of
 `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:02:53 +0100
Message-ID: <87pnehqyeq.fsf@bzg.fr>
References: <87eezelxbq.fsf@gmail.com> <87a75nbsol.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87lfp7lkkx.fsf@gmail.com> <871rqz39ks.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftffli4y.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9oa2sik.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58286)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1j2XoI-0001h7-8p
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:02:59 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Sebastian Miele <sebastian.miele@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Sebastian,

Sebastian Miele <sebastian.miele@gmail.com> writes:

> Part of me feels that I should find a better explanation and spare you
> the trouble of figuring out what I mean. But there seems to be no
> (significantly) better explanation I can come up with without going to
> greater lengths and especially investing considerable time for working
> out very clear terminology for the situation.

You explained things very clearly, it is just that I was somehow tired
and those things are complex to explain (and figure out) by nature.

> I currently feel a tension between not wanting you to have to spend
> considerable time understanding what I wrote and not wanting myself to
> spend time to try to explain it better.

Well, it's always a tradeoff between the time the one reporting the
bug can spend producing a sensible report and the time the bug fixer
can spend understanding and fixing it.

And each side tends to underestimate the time it takes to the other
side... the only big asymmetry here is that there are more reporters
than fixers :)

> However, if it is necessary, I will take the time.

Thanks for this...

> Please try having it in the back of your mind for some days, maybe even
> without actively spending much time on trying to understand it. Then
> tell me if struck or not.

... I'll remember it for next times -- but in this case, the lack of
understanding was because of me.

Best,

-- 
 Bastien