emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jens Lechtenboerger <lechten@wi.uni-muenster.de>
To: Diego Zamboni <diego@zzamboni.org>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: ox-* vs org-* naming convention?
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 07:54:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pnaayuf1.fsf@wi.uni-muenster.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGY83EeU2653z==c0zauOAY5E9=AXeUf1rDPqtVvroprgqERnw@mail.gmail.com> (Diego Zamboni's message of "Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:30:10 +0200")

On 2020-06-07, Diego Zamboni wrote:

> Hi,
> I am working on submitting a new set of exporters I've been working on
> (https://gitlab.com/zzamboni/ox-leanpub) to MELPA, and I received
> feedback [1] about the discrepancy between the package names
> (ox-leanpub-*) and the functions they define (org-leanpub-*). This is
> also flagged by =package-lint=.
> [1] https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/6942
> [...]
> I would appreciate any feedback about this - what are strong arguments
> for or against insisting in this convention vs just adapting to the
> rules suggested by package-lint?

Hi there,

for org-re-reveal, I use a small wrapper ox-re-reveal.el [2], whose
commentary explains this:

;; Org export back-ends have file names starting with "ox-".
;; However, such files typically define variables and functions
;; starting with "org-", which causes errors by package-lint.  To
;; define variables and functions with the usual prefix "org-" while
;; avoiding errors by package-lint, code is located in
;; org-re-reveal.el.
;; However, the prefix "ox-" is hard-coded in org.el and used to load
;; back-ends in `org-export-backends'.  With this file, you can
;; customize `org-export-backends' and add `re-reveal'.  Then, when
;; pressing `C-c C-e', this file will be loaded, which loads
;; org-re-reveal.el.

Best wishes

[2] https://gitlab.com/oer/org-re-reveal/-/blob/master/ox-re-reveal.el

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-08  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-07 16:30 Diego Zamboni
2020-06-07 20:53 ` Kaushal Modi
2020-06-08  5:54 ` Jens Lechtenboerger [this message]
2020-06-08  6:57   ` Diego Zamboni
2020-06-09 19:13     ` Diego Zamboni
2020-06-10 16:57       ` Diego Zamboni
2020-06-10 18:00         ` Kaushal Modi
2020-09-03 10:09         ` Bastien

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pnaayuf1.fsf@wi.uni-muenster.de \
    --to=lechten@wi.uni-muenster.de \
    --cc=diego@zzamboni.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: ox-* vs org-* naming convention?' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).