From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YDJyADb8LWAUVgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:33:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uPfWNzX8LWCbPAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:33:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 265BD125F8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:33:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCbwZ-0005OY-SR for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:33:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCbvN-0005OB-J2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:32:25 -0500 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([91.121.223.63]:44816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCbvK-0002gI-8R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:32:25 -0500 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1613626335; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=x4c0wEFOAqovG1HvAKv+NJu+mNljm+bJbKdjBas3eXs=; b=P3pK5cl6aDTubO/XlvOqSXb2FKL6Vfce9+Io8fXzVRV8uPO51oJfIEE5hH3sftyfsf0PlP KqKFYtEGFoz8h9B6q2J3B71s+3eDkBRUIHeCnrWDYIiNPlrOQFsUhZGkoOamPnoSVBsIAk P4Qo5yYT/mv0DT7iCwqHzzJapV3J6hDjjQswe9yWRD64U/RRwBi77HzXxWmv4HtsyUYJxw q9AV0dXasVoUycVTQRhR9Pc8LSgOmZJNeTBR3f1dKQRszTUH5ZrGnyxbcqbUCO0aUWBxq/ UfS0A602tIHZER1kU43lpwWI3IndmDVDnzRW11TYJB6Ft/uESZYCO5DrNeT79g== From: Kyle Meyer To: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: org-agenda for a day different than today In-Reply-To: <87eehft7gm.fsf@m4x.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:32:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87pn0y2b6p.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.121.223.63; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=out1.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.56 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=key1 header.b=P3pK5cl6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 265BD125F8 X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: tLXjn57bSWbL Alan Schmitt writes: > On 2021-02-16 23:01, Kyle Meyer writes: > [...] >> Here are two threads from around that time that may be related, though I >> haven't reviewed either of them: >> >> https://orgmode.org/list/BLU0-SMTP912FC379760EE431D3D68EBBBC0@phx.gbl/T= /#u >> https://orgmode.org/list/BLU0-SMTP950E9387B34FA390C4FD9CBBBD0@phx.gbl/T= /#u >> >> Moving org-read-date back to the interactive form would allow lisp >> callers to pass in the date, though perhaps it'd bring back some >> misbehavior discussed in the above threads. > > I=E2=80=99ve tried this change here and it works great, thanks a lot. Thanks for testing. > Looking at the code, I don=E2=80=99t see how it could cause trouble elsew= here > (but understanding agenda code is always tricky=E2=80=A6) Yeah, I too think it's safe. If you have the time, I'd appreciate if you could skim through the above threads and see if there are any minimal examples or test cases. If so, it be good to verify that they still work with the patch. > Should I file a bug regarding this? Just this thread is fine. I should find time to put together a proper patch in the next couple of days.