From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id YBJjNHaAUWMOpQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:08:06 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id cPNENHaAUWNwcQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:08:06 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BC62F343 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:08:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ1O-0001Cd-Vd for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:08:03 -0400 Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ10-0000Kr-Gl for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:07:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ0h-0007su-EJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:07:13 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:46167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olZ0e-0006b9-Kf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:07:11 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D937240106 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:07:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1666285626; bh=ZndhWPcs28VVPrVnrdrhkO+OHItfec95OBHv4nVUfcs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=IPgVqwZd6aBK88d7ebjWLHf8QbJwC91qGAmV19LtRezrB9QDoYBiop/Lh482WeVza sD1X2gvZ8KaVz1Re0yv/gUUJTJmYSD3fa/6/WyZR/YeEA04oXBy+PNVo4qHBmCQJzp Pw4sm6dK0SpuJ3NbCGJF9gRG8fbOJ5DBxJEi5/ymX5GkaivB0BzxP9/h8lGkXbOsdg 6uP074RAylrEBcrDIcJrviwImiYitUqO+W9e0Tdgy5JWuu0QG/dVsRS+fHkokZx9rl HN/f22QTm5ov4ZdnzqA18rJpVHko0u4V6VI4WG3Pq9hCIFBQOPOUpf1pqZRpGXI6Ua QCE1rNsXlfGRw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MtYtJ5kTzz9rxD; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:07:04 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Max Nikulin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Line breaks and brackets in LaTeX export References: <875ygk6a8z.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65vitbz.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87edv6izx4.fsf@localhost> <8735bmelgu.fsf@posteo.net> <878rlecx49.fsf@posteo.net> <874jw2conh.fsf@posteo.net> <87edv5hhgb.fsf@localhost> <87o7u9rz1a.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7u8cvox.fsf@localhost> <87wn8wysg0.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:07:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Max Nikulin's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:31:47 +0700") Message-ID: <87pmemwhjd.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666285686; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=j63u/dIEehKL8wVUmwnB96qOYhGWpt35ov9fZ+F55gM=; b=ejMxMWLqJ4h95oHdFTYyMpcZlL1SaWGXCuIvMDgNkXjdP8z2qH20L0C4qykeghgrtQ4200 S6vPQ1sTg1vx4XiIBQQGqEBOfTcxWoIAxAYszFoNky3tr8c9bDd8+8U2Gv+87GwEYPf4Ja ensK+TOTfYaSopoDDGCrOEKh/EhCaKBkpqFCfX6exj2CNYMqKmRMgF1JuRyi6XnKXoEz7U 7MnYmxPuHwX1XjZpRQtS262S4TN4ESRyHNlcEqWsMiT49+jgzXkVNLSOk1bYFdtqpCKXEp MEVpHrlLzDCfpl7Npc58GMldxlMFolbjtw9nH6varsYiTAX4I2RYY3Obt1DHAA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666285686; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oM+QYq9s6BS/SdxeuK5CKleabY16zL9E7ClwWBMoXl7bT4BjInhphPc8bQinu3ndyyjDBt +9Wc+NhwQ9vG8Xe6/+fg9/M6djdZkmM7tfiH2pPUZg+dNir+uc4u4vOT7kekdj7fowAwll BNCV/j3bnj0mF4KsNuUw2zJLuZLJv6aThXwFWxHMYyFREr/JC2rgwgpOlAqTnEjH4e6U6a qMR2DuY5JFGTRwO4sZ6HPlyW8O5LGrTk9W1rGslYhTGtcfog3leTvN5szqGccuzBhTZiUl ifaPnyJ1C3bmniJb1d4tKJHSr2LLeXLmqW9ZXkaNMKj4QhFbNTtyVlE7qTi03A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=IPgVqwZd; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.73 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=IPgVqwZd; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 80BC62F343 X-Spam-Score: -5.73 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: h8V69GUx6EXO Max Nikulin writes: > A workaround for tabularray: > > \NewTableCommand\empty{} > > I am unsure if we should use it. Ah, I had just commented on this in the email I just sent... >> By the way, now I remember that the package verse adds a series of >> extra >> arguments to \\ (p. 6 in the documentation: > > \\! command between stanzas to get proper line count makes things a > bit more complicated. I believed that some TeX trick may be used > instead of requirement of the explicit command. In my custom code that I commented on in another email, \\! is automatically inserted if verse numbering is active. My intention is to incorporate that into my patch (work-in-progress) over the spaces between verses.