From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id +FHwC3lR02Q4bQEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 10:42:33 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0DTvC3lR02QtMgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 10:42:33 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0414C3B6 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=WGruZkJ7; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1691570552; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=7Cy6D7B9i3xoLl0ZbbC0a95qTn8gNRtlTV0RNa0Q1lM=; b=XnmyTgoEPYFeicasND398uG0lZsClcIGcv1CPnwoiiQciRKXicY3mJSa44fzHRK0DOPG1c oW8P6E6Hr7FjL4pmPNTPcOoSx5i3i8G4gv82yMQPhiU1b2toi+HXUYmcSAi3M7wTFgERzy 50Uqtf9SjPftN1mi+rWxn9OlU6cd0qc7hmdtXpK/lBJBm8TKuj+7lMslNRToyvih/haJty jKBk8VIfRT0eU+BvTptgLHdwyXwP2SZgklYibJNkoKBAc5L9DuFoRs8pRPZxKrEIGPU1jb lW2Iemgeze5MWIB600V1a0N8je6HOp3DrJDrQc3aK4amBUBtAuwUjgkDJm+Hog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=WGruZkJ7; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1691570552; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=P4bL5XXstG3LOt22KtW7AtdMFn5OLkuRS6dToyrmmvYAOKixRPpFRMwFv/6MFyUcySmIcX Y/s3bNCyKindqTXNV7U4c+ZTDU8WUJ37uVscm4ylTu6+xk1yLIHRunCZ1o5ftj+yrlMEsf x9vT50UVDU3/lxKlwm+PkK4xeYo748dQU+4Ar1+UUffU1zGfbpkH3TKWrMP+eVCGSoRjS+ P+fDgLGpxJhGZdrGpXwcDPGN66hPLaurElTndEUvuQtFSK+sofmBxMpjfeN2FEXPSIQ5t/ RLTpwy0dNhntGXD6hjVxiYL/NCdKD5ILuIDateABpNbYqlCgE8GCgfsPrpvyXw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTelJ-000430-NZ; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 04:41:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTelI-00042c-8r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 04:41:48 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTelG-00034s-3R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 04:41:48 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95516240104 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:41:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1691570501; bh=7Cy6D7B9i3xoLl0ZbbC0a95qTn8gNRtlTV0RNa0Q1lM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=WGruZkJ7KtadMVkQIUfp2KaACsZdzAtoJJR8EWofkEWi0tBvhOVezyBk4JISja799 3yQEgzyMItoJQW4C5WLN/00ZtOtjdoWPZwJMA+s9t0Ly22QUDb1Jtgbp2Iz8Yubg02 OZaUrC5J8yoKFbMtZklHEYqMFCugXGEm5yN++o1iGm+Nude7vRD0+BWJp0yLRq2LJK DzGH4TmwInnlAb03/TFYsWGjeKktByUgjn2FR4wsyWSKW9jPV7H1n1n/L0zBK6u6p/ 4Bz7jXOA0hJP0sg1asWZ5n/8KeOlczy/AL51kJhkMKZ6uy1UnU7e1whvK69O8IRXWi sqMPc6OQXsNMw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RLNnw74VCz9rxS; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:41:40 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: orgmode Subject: Re: [patch] ox-latex.el: fix blank lines behavior in verse block In-Reply-To: <87o7jgejhl.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Wed, 09 Aug 2023 07:57:10 +0000") References: <87tttcml75.fsf@posteo.net> <87edkf6px1.fsf@localhost> <87350ug413.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7jgejhl.fsf@localhost> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 08:41:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87pm3wfvzx.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AD0414C3B6 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.75 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.75 X-TUID: 9YMjIvT581xU Ihor Radchenko writes: >>> I see nothing that would prevent merging this patch. >>> However, I believe that removing blank lines before/after content is >>> something we may want to do in other built-in backends as well. WDYT? >> >> I think you're right. My impression is that the blank lines before/after >> content is not a desired feature, but rather a consequence of >> substituting line breaks to create the space between stanzas. > > Do you mean that people use extra leading/trailing spaces just to get > extra vertical space before/after the verse block in _latex_ export? No, I don't think people use it for that purpose. I meant that if someone puts a space before or after the content (which can be usual, for clarity): #+begin_verse blah... #+end_verse that vertical space appears in the export, which shouldn't. --=20 Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas https://juanmanuelmacias.com https://lunotipia.juanmanuelmacias.com https://gnutas.juanmanuelmacias.com