From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: XHTML export -   etc. Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:07:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87ode0126r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071102121343.GD31416@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87sl3oxkep.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y7de9o23.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mytqkl9q.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874pfxv9xx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871wazoumm.fsf@columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrQae-0008Al-E0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:08:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrQac-0008A6-Mu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:07:59 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrQac-0008A3-Jm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:07:58 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IrQac-0004Mo-4v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:07:58 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so1442376fkr for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:07:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871wazoumm.fsf@columbia.edu> (Xiao-Yong Jin's message of "Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:40:33 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Xiao-Yong Jin writes: > "Eddward DeVilla" writes: > >> I feel tempted to bring up my suggestion of [markup|text] format >> again, but I've been resisting because I feel like a develish nag. So >> [*|at-syntax] could still be html specific if you really want >> something html specific, but there would be something that could be >> portable to all export formats. It would just be a matter of deciding >> what 'org' marks should be supported and making sure exporters try to >> support them. And of course there are other ways to get around *at >> syntax*. > > I would vote against heavily mark-up format like that. I > guess the original design of org-mode is to make a simple > text file that can make personal information organization > much simpler in emacs, as opposed to those half-mark-up > languages like emacs-muse. FWIW, I second this. -- Bastien