From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Davison Subject: Re: org-babel feature request Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: <87ocoezm01.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> References: <873a5qyb9h.fsf@cuma.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwoRd-0001GT-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:46:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwoRY-0001Br-CT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:46:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56556 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwoRY-0001Bo-AI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:45:56 -0400 Received: from markov.stats.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.210.1]:33599) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MwoRX-0001uA-Rt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:45:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <873a5qyb9h.fsf@cuma.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Maurizio Vitale's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:23:06 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: maurizio.vitale@polymath-solutions.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Maurizio Vitale writes: [...] > It would be nice if it was possible to have multiple result > sections. This way I could embed in the document the result that was > obtained when writing the documentation, while still allowing the person > following the recipe to evaluate again the shell script and get the > results on his machine. > > The first section should be read-only (not necessarily physically > read-only, but skipped by C-c C-c). The others may be re-evaluated over > and over until the end user has a valid configuration. Hi Maurizio, Once I've obtained the results that I want to "freeze", I would manually alter (or even delete) the #+resname tag, so that the source block no longer overwrites it. Is that simple solution appropriate? I'm not yet seeing the advantage of the more complex possibilities. Dan > > I'm not sure whether there's something more general than this, like > attaching tags (that could be even elisp function) to result sections > that do different things, one of which being enabling the section to > receive results. > > Ok, I'm just bouncing ideas in case others see something useful. I've > just started using org-babel and maybe I'll see different ways for > achieving this. > > Thanks again for org-babel, > > Maurizio > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode