From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Behavior of Gnus when called from an hyperlink Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:50:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87oce7j26i.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87r5jrcx9g.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8763138nna.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ocev5pn3.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fx071fsg.fsf@mundaneum.com> <23582.1277735944@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87vd936wiq.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87eifr3t52.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87vd8gcu6k.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53083 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZfm1-0006Sc-TI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:56:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZfge-00085m-6i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:50:25 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZfge-00085U-0c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:50:24 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZfgb-0000Er-Qz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:50:21 +0200 Received: from p54af1f70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.175.31.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:50:21 +0200 Received: from tassilo by p54af1f70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:50:21 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sébastien Vauban writes: Hi Sébastien, > I've followed Nick's procedure, hoping to get even more details: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Function Name Call Count Elapsed Time Average Time > ... > gnus-request-head 1 312.993525 312.993525 > gnus-activate-group 1 13.587475 13.587475 > gnus-group-read-group 1 7.949638 7.949638 > ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Looks to me that `gnus-request-head' is the culprit. Looking at the code, I cannot see why that function is so slow. I'd try to edebug that to see what exact part of it takes that long. > Does this help you to help me? ;-) We're getting closer. ;-) Bye, Tassilo