From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:32:49 -0600 Message-ID: <87oc7cagmm.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48094 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfcpx-000050-AY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfcpw-0005Ck-3D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:53 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:38321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfcpv-0005CY-TD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:32:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jeff Horn's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:07:21 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jeff Horn Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Bastien , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jeff Horn writes: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore > wrote: >> I think this might be unnecessary (hitting "Back", typing the "Home" >> key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do >> this). > > I'm not an expert, but that is not very "accessible". Shouldn't be a > problem with modern text browsers, but I remember this being an > accessibility recommendation for FAQish pages at my previous > university. Hm, that sounds a bit like folklore. Is there some accessibility standard we can follow, and should we (how up-to-date are these documents relative to modern "accessible" browsers)? I noticed every other project FAQ I came across doesn't do this: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/FAQ https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitFaq http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_:_FAQs