From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Myles English Subject: Re: [odt] equation labels Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:50:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87obz57qgg.fsf@bill.home> References: <87pqjw6vpr.fsf@bill.home> <81wrdy4iot.fsf@gmail.com> <87sjoh7s6x.fsf@bill.home> Reply-To: Myles English Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QyjIZ-00041d-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:49:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QyjIY-00064f-Lw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:49:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QyjIY-00064O-FY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:49:38 -0400 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so501529wyi.0 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:49:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sjoh7s6x.fsf@bill.home> (Myles English's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:09:58 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:09:58 +0100, Myles English said: >> I have added support for honoring captions, label and attributes >> for images that are dervied from latex fragments. Checkout the git >> repo and let me know if there are any rough edges that need to be >> ironed out. > Thank you! I have just got around to trying this out and it works > great. The only issue now is that the resolution of the pngs is low > and looks terrible. I vaguely remember changing it deep in my latex > installation somewhere. Actually there is an old (2006) thread including a patch about a file option to change the resolution: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2006-09/msg00010.html But I don't think it was applied and I am not sure how it would fit in the current scheme. Can anyone advise? Myles