From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Export problem (Wrong type argument: consp, nil)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:25:56 -0600
Message-ID: <87obykpjjx.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <80litzcbg1.fsf@somewhere.org> <87hb4ndj1f.fsf@gmail.com>
	<80y5xrld4x.fsf@somewhere.org> <87wrd9hkfv.fsf@gmail.com>
	<80litoaj9f.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40364)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1R4amd-0002JB-St
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:57:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1R4amc-00015z-Iu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:56:55 -0400
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:64023)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1R4amc-00014v-C4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:56:54 -0400
Received: by mail-iy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n33so3441604iae.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi

"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Thanks for working on this test, I look forward to adding it once it is
>> completed.
>
> As promised, a patch for checking that vars with no default value will
> generate an error with a full explanation.
>
> I edited 2 files:
> - lisp/test-ob.el
> - examples/babel.org
>

Great! Thanks for contributing these test cases.  They are now applied
and are passing.

>
> Tell me if this is following your expected way of receiving patches. I believe
> so, but tell me anything that would not have been done correctly...
>

Yes, I do prefer these format of patch (i.e., generated using git
format-patch), however I would prefer if you only sent a single patch
for all changed files, rather than splitting the commit up into two
patches.

Thanks -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/