emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
To: Yu <yu_icq@gmx.at>
Cc: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: "noweb-ref": Limiting scope of definitions?
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:16:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87obtilgtb.fsf@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANtbJLED9WY4DDm0c7r4oDEJ8pYOeNC_dX5DLao9sTd7HU+49w@mail.gmail.com>

Yu <yu_icq@gmx.at> writes:

> Hello!
> Scenario
> -----------------
>   * Maintain a potentially long org file as an appendix.
>   * In this appendix, many independent scripting tasks will be documented.
>   * Each such scripting task has similiar partial tasks, e.g. imports,
> "settings", ...
> In such a case, many independent scripts may contain a block
> "<<imports>>" or something or something to the same effect, i.e. an
> overlap of definitions could be avoided only by some sort of scoping:
>   (a) manually, e.g. by prefixing the names with a script-specific
>         string (e.g. <<task1-imports>>. While this is flexible (i.e.
>         allows reuse of code from other script), it also reduces the
>         readability of the NOWEB code).
>   (b) providing some sort of scoping, e.g. declaring definitions section-local.
> Implementation Idea
> ----------------------------------
> A simple implementation, maintaining the flexibility of the manual
> solution, would be to create a header argument like ":noweb-prefix",
> that effectively just adds a prefix to the noweb reference names (both
> in declaring the block (#+name, :noweb-ref) and in using it
> (<<name>>)), unless such a prefix is explicitly specified. This could
> then be set as needed, for specific blocks or subtrees (as property)
> or any mixture of such.
> A prefix would then be recognized by a delimiter string to be specified.
> This solution would also be downward compatible with existing files,
> as the syntax for recognizing a prefix would be relevant only when
> deciding whether to apply an explicitly introduced ":noweb-prefix".

This does seem like a good idea and a header argument such as
":noweb-prefix" is certainly the way to implement such functionality.

I'll add this to my long term stack.


Eric Schulte

      reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30 16:31 Yu
2012-02-01 14:16 ` Eric Schulte [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87obtilgtb.fsf@gmx.com \
    --to=eric.schulte@gmx.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=yu_icq@gmx.at \
    --subject='Re: "noweb-ref": Limiting scope of definitions?' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).