From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: [dev] Implement "ref" link types Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:38:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87obskyptq.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <87vcn2vgq7.fsf@gmail.com> <8739a62upy.fsf@gmail.com> <763A8736-3DB8-492D-95CB-2E2D90982BAE@gmail.com> <87y5rx22km.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty2l17o7.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa4csr86.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87pqd81r5j.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Feb_27_21:38:22_2012-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S27L3-00006M-Ev for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:38:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S27L2-0006K3-78 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:38:29 -0500 Received: from app1a.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.161]:39575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S27L2-0006Jw-0f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:38:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pqd81r5j.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: David Maus , Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Feb_27_21:38:22_2012-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII At Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:18:00 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > David Maus writes: > > > I don't see why we should drop the link type in fuzzy links. After all > > they /are/ are special type of link. > > There is no link type in fuzzy links : [[something]] matches > <> in master. > > > Without the link type we will run into trouble, won't we?. > > > > In the example file: > > > > ,---- > > | We end the list at item [[itm:last]]. > > `---- > > > > So, itm:last is a fuzzy link but it could as well be a "regular" link > > of type "itm" with a path component of "last" and no description. > > I realize my examples are confusing. I shouldn't have used colons. In > fact, the output will be the same if the target is <>, > <> or even <>. > > In other words, the "itm:" part wasn't meant as a link type, but as > a cosmetic part of the name. So the list example could as well be: Thanks for the clarification. Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Feb_27_21:38:22_2012-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk9L6cEACgkQDMLgk1Evc4WyrQD/Q9JanNZEEimFIaIYRyNtS9c7 iEHI9r24XBTnluJXgdkBAJZLZcIcXux4v053FUxhtf6F+QUC/IBv+1wkMYGCRH0K =+ZoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Feb_27_21:38:22_2012-1--