At Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:18:00 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > David Maus writes: > > > I don't see why we should drop the link type in fuzzy links. After all > > they /are/ are special type of link. > > There is no link type in fuzzy links : [[something]] matches > <> in master. > > > Without the link type we will run into trouble, won't we?. > > > > In the example file: > > > > ,---- > > | We end the list at item [[itm:last]]. > > `---- > > > > So, itm:last is a fuzzy link but it could as well be a "regular" link > > of type "itm" with a path component of "last" and no description. > > I realize my examples are confusing. I shouldn't have used colons. In > fact, the output will be the same if the target is <>, > <> or even <>. > > In other words, the "itm:" part wasn't meant as a link type, but as > a cosmetic part of the name. So the list example could as well be: Thanks for the clarification. Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de