* Problem with dates while generating HTML
@ 2012-03-05 16:10 François Pinard
2012-03-05 16:32 ` Nick Dokos
2012-04-10 17:42 ` Bastien
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: François Pinard @ 2012-03-05 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 357 bytes --]
Given the following header contents:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Problème date
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
[-- Attachment #2: Capture du 2012-03-05.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 21033 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 184 bytes --]
I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
it a limitation (or a bug)?
François
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with dates while generating HTML
2012-03-05 16:10 Problem with dates while generating HTML François Pinard
@ 2012-03-05 16:32 ` Nick Dokos
2012-04-10 17:42 ` Bastien
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Dokos @ 2012-03-05 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard; +Cc: nicholas.dokos, emacs-orgmode
François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> Given the following header contents:
>
> * Problème date
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
>
> here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
>
>
> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
> it a limitation (or a bug)?
>
[2012-02-29] looks like an inactive date, as well as the description of
a link. I presume the ambiguity causes this problem, so you somehow
have to disambiguate it. Prefixing it with Du (or just about anything,
including a space) is one way to do that.
So a limitation certainly - a bug? Maybe, maybe not.
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with dates while generating HTML
2012-03-05 16:10 Problem with dates while generating HTML François Pinard
2012-03-05 16:32 ` Nick Dokos
@ 2012-04-10 17:42 ` Bastien
2012-04-10 19:42 ` François Pinard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bastien @ 2012-04-10 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: François Pinard; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hi François,
pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
> it a limitation (or a bug)?
I would call it a limitation.
--
Bastien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with dates while generating HTML
2012-04-10 17:42 ` Bastien
@ 2012-04-10 19:42 ` François Pinard
2012-04-10 20:46 ` Bastien
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: François Pinard @ 2012-04-10 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi François,
Bonjour, Bastien!
>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
>> it a limitation (or a bug)?
> I would call it a limitation.
Could it be documented somewhere appropriate? Along with Nick's
suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.
François
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with dates while generating HTML
2012-04-10 19:42 ` François Pinard
@ 2012-04-10 20:46 ` Bastien
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bastien @ 2012-04-10 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: François Pinard; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Bonjour François,
pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi François,
>
> Bonjour, Bastien!
>
>>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
>>> it a limitation (or a bug)?
>
>> I would call it a limitation.
>
> Could it be documented somewhere appropriate? Along with Nick's
> suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.
Yes, it could be documented in an appropriate place in Worg.
Please suggest one and send a patch!
Best,
--
Bastien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-10 20:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-05 16:10 Problem with dates while generating HTML François Pinard
2012-03-05 16:32 ` Nick Dokos
2012-04-10 17:42 ` Bastien
2012-04-10 19:42 ` François Pinard
2012-04-10 20:46 ` Bastien
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).