From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [dev] About a beamer back-end Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:03:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87obocodo7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ehpg8vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipep83ds.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ehpbphcz.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3z32eug.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wr30ohn1.fsf@gmail.com> <807gv01zwh.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShjuD-0006HL-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:06:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Shju7-0004Vg-G1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:06:49 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Shju7-0004VT-5x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:06:43 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Shju4-0000LL-4j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:06:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <807gv01zwh.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:51:42 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hello, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> - Sectioning and packages are extracted from `org-e-latex-classes'. >> Since calling Beamer back-end is explicit, it can be applied on any >> tex file, not only when that file starts with >> "\documentclass{beamer}". Additionally, an equivalent to >> `org-beamer-use-parts' is unnecessary. > > I did not understand that one. At the moment, beamer exporter is hooked into regular latex exporter when latex class is "beamer". This restriction is unnecessary when you consider beamer as an independent back-end (i.e. you can call beamer export even on your "article" setup). > I'm wondering, though, how you support the special case of "beamer frame > level" set to 0, where we need to add the tag "B_frame" (in fact, the > property) to show where the frame really begins. Would you mind providing an example for that? I am not aware of that special case. > I liked the fact we had 2 types of highlighting (bold, in black, and > alert, in red, in my case). > > I would say that, as Beamer has those 2 different highlightings, we should be > able to still support both. Is this a problem? Not really a problem, but Org limits text markup to six elements. You can easily choose to use another one for bold (i.e. with filters), though. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou