From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Myles English" <mylesenglish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: export of #+INCLUDE appears broken with :exports results
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:27:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87obk3hnmj.fsf@ed.ac.uk>
References: <87391fexaq.fsf@ed.ac.uk>,<80hapvc3z8.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40656)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mylesenglish@gmail.com>) id 1TNkZk-0004q8-Rn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:19:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mylesenglish@gmail.com>) id 1TNkZf-0000ta-2I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:19:20 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:46838)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mylesenglish@gmail.com>) id 1TNkZe-0000tS-RR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:19:14 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hj13so1600017wib.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <80hapvc3z8.fsf@somewhere.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Hi Sebastien,

Sebastien Vauban writes:

> Did you try first locally in the same file?

Eh?  Include the file in itself?  If you mean did I execute the source
block: yes, and it works.

> Did you try with downcase for the TBLNAME keyword? I know it (all upper or
> down-case) was important at some point in time, but don't remember if this is
> still of importance.

I have tried all those variations, and using #+name instead of #+tblname
the only thing that makes a difference is removing ":exports results".
I think it a bug.

Myles