From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: C-u C-c C-t not behaving as documented Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 07:40:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87obh2yft8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Trjui-0004uV-VT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:40:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Trjuh-0002Nf-RO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:40:56 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:55824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Trjuh-0002NY-KU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 01:40:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fn15so1134531wgb.32 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:40:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Brian van den Broek's message of "Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:55 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Brian van den Broek Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Brian, thanks for the detailed feedback on this. Brian van den Broek writes: > I'm perfectly happy with the behaviour I observe. Me too :) > But, it isn't what > one would expect from reading the docs. The manual was describing the behavior *when there is no fast todo selection key*. But it was not complete. I just fixed the doc, hopefully things are clearer now. > (I suspect that the docs might > not have been updated when org-todo-keywords was introduced. Or, as > has happened before, I've misunderstood something.) See http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=2949012f0 `org-todo-keywords' was here a long time ago when the default value of `org-use-fast-todo-selection' was changed (after Carsten's poll on default values for variables...) Thanks! -- Bastien