From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yasushi SHOJI Subject: Re: parser: verbatim or code? Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:51:02 +0900 Message-ID: <87ob27tp8p.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> References: <87iosg1oge.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87mwhsfo9e.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExRQ-0000Cs-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:51:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExRK-0001TI-OH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:51:12 -0500 Received: from p654782.hkidff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp ([121.101.71.130]:45376 helo=dns1.atmark-techno.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExRK-0001T8-EY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:51:06 -0500 Received: from sv-prius.atmark-techno.com (sv-prius.local-network [192.168.10.102]) by dns1.atmark-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6128359B for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:51:03 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87mwhsfo9e.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, At Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:23:41 -0500, Nick Dokos wrote: > > I think it's a code bug: ~verbatim~ is the precedent-setting latex > convention. > > However fixing it might break existing documents (although in many > instances code and verbatim are treated equivalently, so that might > not be much of a problem). A quick grep on export back-ends reveals that some back-ends uses them differently. Namely - latex - man - org ;-) - texinfo Should I just leave as-is? -- yashi